🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if such holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are working on steps to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."